Department Of Transportation - Warning!!
DOT warning You are accessing a U.S. Government information system. This information system, including all related equipment, networks, and network devices, is provided for U.S. Government-authorized use only. Unauthorized or improper use of this system is prohibited, and may result in civil and criminal penalties, or administrative disciplinary action.
The communications and data stored or transiting this system may be, for any lawful Government purpose, monitored, recorded, and subject to audit or investigation. By using this system, you understand and consent to such terms. View User Behavior Rules

Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
  • Disclaimer: Any opinions, findings, and recommendations expressed in the group area discussions are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Government, the Department of Transportation, or the Federal Highway Administration.
Edited: 4/24/2012 8:36 AM

Implementing Mitigation of Other Agencies

To carry out mitigation on behalf of another agency that was offered in the other agency's EIS/EA - is it required to prepare a subsequent EA/EIS to carry out the mitigation or does the initial EA/EIS carry some weight/reduce need for further analysis?

2011-07-07 22:07:21
Posted: 4/24/2012 8:36 AM
(Assumptions - Agency carrying out mitigation is a Federal Agency. Agency carrying out the mitigation was not a cooperating agency on the original NEPA.)

1.  All Federal agencies must comply w/ NEPA (and other Federal laws) before implementing an action, including 'beneficial' actions and other agency's mitigation.

2.  One Agency's compliance w/ NEPA does not equate to NEPA compliance for all Federal agencies.

3.  Therefore, the agency conducting the mitigation would need to do its own NEPA compliance.

See question No. 30 of the 40 most asked questions and ceq regulation 1506.3.

7/8/2011 11:29 AM